|
|
Post by messageman on Feb 20, 2011 3:47:20 GMT -5
over the years I've read your post's uncle and they were the most ' not some of the most ' caring comments and filled with rightious info. And now when I ,we ' need some good UNCLE JJ advise 'man just be you. Thats all no more and no less . I realy hope things are going well unc your a good oL boy and I appricciat your knowlage. Your wellbeing is in my prayrs bro . Hope to here from you here . Mns has gotten to complicatid too use . And that sucks too anyway take care Hi Johnyjumper  So, you’ve been on these PE sites for years? …and I’m guessing you’ve read all there is to know about the implant, but you base your decision to get the implant on one posting by Regularguy (see Regularguy’s thread)…A posting in which he readily admits that he has no idea why there has been no retraction or other complications.  |
|
|
|
Post by allofme2 on Feb 24, 2011 13:09:52 GMT -5
Mustang you say
"Seems like the new implant and the procedure are now getting a lot better after all the trials and errors and I suspect that the new implant is becoming more successful with a higher success rate than the last one."
On what basis do you make this statement - one feedback? When are you going to wake up to the fact this is part of the marketing ploy - every year bring out the 'new improved' version except the results stay the same. Someone commented that the dr has been doing this since 1990 - and no doubt charging for each upgrade.
|
|
|
|
Post by mustang2020 on Feb 24, 2011 22:20:42 GMT -5
I do not need to wake up at all, I am always up. If you read my words carefully, you will see that they are accurate based on what has been reported in this forum. There has been a fewer complications reported on this site with the new implant than with the older one. So, if the reports are accurate regarding the old and the new implants, weather good or bad, "it seems" (my original words) that the new implant is better. Again, the key words you must have missed : seems like. The Dr had plenty of time to improve on his procedure and "may be" he has improved it, nothing wrong with that.
Do not confuse the Dr ethics with the implant surgery procedure!
(edited for spelling and added some extra words for clarity)
|
|
|
|
Post by allofme2 on Feb 25, 2011 11:50:43 GMT -5
Mustang - this is not an attack - it is merely looking for the basis of your statement. How many new patients who have received the so-called new softer implant are on here reporting success as compared to the old? I can't see a pattern which is why I ask the question.
|
|
|
|
Post by hoddle10 on Feb 25, 2011 13:48:45 GMT -5
The Dr he is currently working with apparently thinks the implant still needs work. So it seems those recieving the new softer version, are as much guniea pigs, as those who trialled all the previous unsuccessful versions.
|
|
ck62498
Contributing Member
Posts: 62
|
Post by ck62498 on Mar 19, 2011 6:18:20 GMT -5
Mustang, It's been awhile.. Hope you have been well.. How's the length coming? Are you still considering some sort of revision?
Be well..
CK
|
|
ck62498
Contributing Member
Posts: 62
|
Post by ck62498 on Mar 19, 2011 6:28:09 GMT -5
Uncle, best of luck to you.. Don't know your whole story, i'll have to scroll back and read from the begining. Hope all is well..
CK
|
|
|
|
Post by mustang2020 on Mar 19, 2011 7:06:47 GMT -5
Mustang, It's been awhile.. Hope you have been well.. How's the length coming? Are you still considering some sort of revision? Be well.. CK Thx CK. I have measured about .25 to .35 of an erect length coming back. There is still some minor pain near the glans. With all the talk about the pmma, I am very interested in a revision but I need to wait a while to finalize my decision. Hope you are doing well too. |
|
|
|
Post by sheldon on Mar 19, 2011 12:23:17 GMT -5
uncle jj,
How are you doing and how is the implant working out for you?
|
|
?