|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 1, 2010 15:20:59 GMT -5
Envision, do you know if Dr. Casavantes would be willing to do more than 15cc on the first trip (even it might mean costing more)? Or does he set the limit at 15cc for some important reason?
I ask because I'm not at liberty to travel to the west coast as often as I'd like, so top-offs would be minimal...meaning I'd like to get as much girth gain on the initial appointment as (safely) possible.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 1, 2010 15:16:25 GMT -5
I hope your assessment on the value of opinions from American doctors has some legitimacy envision, and I hope you are right hah. For $1500 and being just over the border, it makes for the most realistic augmentation situation for me yet. I'll be staying tuned in.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 1, 2010 4:01:50 GMT -5
The last link I posted had two different doctors expressing considerable doubt about the safety of PMMA...hopefully we'll hear from the Doc's office regarding their reasons to believe its safe injecting it.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 1, 2010 4:00:45 GMT -5
from: www.steinwall.com/ART-PMMA.htmlPMMA is often used in various implants because of its compatibility with human tissue. Because of its transparency and bio-compatibility, PMMA is important in ophthalmology for replacing the intraocular lens of cataract patient. PMMA is used as bone cement in orthopedic surgery. The modulus of elasticity is similar to natural bone giving it a more natural feeling for the patient than metallic alternatives. The benefits of utilizing PMMA within the body are countered with the exotherm that occurs while curing the acrylic. This generation of heat has the potential to damage surrounding tissue. "Countered with the exotherm that occurs while curing the acrylic..." Can anyone with a science background explain what the heck that means? I am trying to find any "CONS" involved with PMMA being put in our bodies but I'm not sure if this tidbit is of any relevance when it comes to PMMA injections into the penis - but it doesn't hurt to check it out. Also check out these, though not directly related to penis injections, they involve the use of PMMA: www.thebody.com/Forums/AIDS/FacialWasting/Q204521.htmlwww.plasticsurgery.org/Patients_and_Consumers/Procedures/Cosmetic_Procedures_-_Minimally_Invasive/PMMA_Fillers_.htmlwww.makemeheal.com/answers/viewQuestion.do?qid=1763
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 1, 2010 3:48:50 GMT -5
Thanks for the additional links gsxr and envision!
I'm curious to know why American phalloplasty surgeons haven't gone the PMMA route? It seems more prevalent abroad if you are looking to get it injected into your penis (correct me if I'm mistaken).
I'll have to do some personal research on PMMA because its not quite so simple. Silicone implants have been used all over the body with much success -- but using it in the penis has caused problems...PMMA is simply another synthetic filler, so I tread with caution.
I'm not sure about Internet Explorer, but Google Chrome gives you the option to translate pages automatically (to the best of its ability) when coming across foreign sites.
Hope this stuff is legit because unlike other fillers, it doesn't seem to face the risk of absorption. I'm very curious to know how it feels.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 30, 2010 17:07:50 GMT -5
envisionmore, this sounds remarkable, and on paper it seems like a more ideal alternative than fat because of its permanency - except how do we know how safe PMMA is in the long term when used in the penis?
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 29, 2010 23:15:21 GMT -5
Florida, I moved these posts out of its original thread and created a new thread. The original thread was regarding MNS, and I thought it would be easier for members to find this topic if labeled more accurately.
Continue the discussion here.
Florida, any updates on your twins there? The set look pretty natural.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 29, 2010 23:09:17 GMT -5
Just BUMPING this thread to remind those to stay in tune for the Q&A Thread coming our way shortly.
The doctor said he'd have it to me ASAP, but that was near Thanksgiving and give him the benefit of the doubt that plans got changed.
Now that we've all resumed normal work hours, I suspect he'll have this out to me soon. I did send him a new email to be sure we can get this on pace. Sorry for the delay on the Q&A folks, hope to have it all up soon.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 29, 2010 22:52:17 GMT -5
BUMP.
Lets get some more votes in.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 29, 2010 22:48:52 GMT -5
The stars under your name wont determine whether you can see it or not. A member is a member.
However, if its password restricted, the criteria becomes more specific.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 29, 2010 17:10:53 GMT -5
mark, any updates? When you say you were "one of the lucky ones," you are implying you lost little to no length right?
My biggest obstacle with going through with the Elist route is the risk of retraction. I don't exactly boast a great length to start with, so losing even a quarter-inch would be highly devastating. I know according to the doc himself, retraction is EXPECTED in the early stages post surgery - and that in time the length will return. I suppose this is plausible, especially if aided by a hanging device (done safely). At MNS, I believe Mustang said it was advised never to hang post-op. I just don't see why light-to-mild weights couldn't be used like 6 months post-op to obtain some length.
Speaking of Mustang, he has yet to gain his full length back. I wish the physiological mechanism behind retraction could be better explained in this instance. I know we've theorized implant length and glans-stitching as possible culprits, but this is ultimately speculation. I wonder how much R&D Elist does himself...seems to me he went to softer implants based on complaints rather than sheer data analysis. That's disconcerting.
Hope to hear from you Mark, you'd be surprised but I think discussion activity here is on pace to surpass MNS, especially given the "Moderator approval" situation. Viewership is still much higher over there than here, but that will change in time too.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 26, 2010 22:46:09 GMT -5
oh and Stormy, as for contacting the Doctor... I bothered not to.
I'm already aware of 2 others who have proposed the same question to him, now you make 3. I figured if I also wrote to him, it would only slow him that much more in getting a response. I would, however, contact him by phone if this information doesn't hit PhalloBoards sooner than later.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 26, 2010 22:44:49 GMT -5
It isn't just the prosthesis I care about, its the technique itself. Dr. Elist must demonstrate
1) why retraction occurred with some patients with the old prosthesis and/or technique
and
2) what does his new prosthesis and/or technique does to resolve the retraction problem so its non-existent.
That's right... "non-existent!" Because as far as I'm concerned, there should be no reason to offer "Lengthening" as a procedure that faces a risk of LOSING LENGTH. It seems like something in the procedure is NOT fundamentally sound.
I understand that any phalloplasty method is a work in progress, and techniques are being improved every year. Which is why I will give the doctor the benefit of the doubt and hope he can really give us some answers.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 26, 2010 19:52:16 GMT -5
Bumping thread.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 26, 2010 19:45:32 GMT -5
BUMP!
I want to be sure visiting guests and members see this so we get more contribution to the survey.
I'm still split between FFT and Implant. Supposedly there is a new "softer" version of the implant and perhaps even a revised technique, I'm hoping some answers come trickling in soon.
|
|