|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 15, 2010 7:10:05 GMT -5
also, how long did you retain the fat before it became noticeably re-absorbed?
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 15, 2010 7:06:10 GMT -5
Hey iain, welcome on board. When your FFT did manage to stay in the time it was there, how would you describe its realism and girth?
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 15, 2010 7:01:14 GMT -5
yardstick, you'd be surprised how "OKAY" your penis is. Imagine a penis, that has never been enhanced by surgery, possessing stats along the lines of:
3.5" - 3.75" midshaft erect girth (slight variations due to erection quality).
4" NBPEL, 5" BPEL (Not a fat guy, but there is a thick fat pad)
So on a non-bone pressed day with mediocre erection quality, this person whips out a 4 x 3.5...how would you feel about approaching sex then?
sux residing in the gray zone above micro but below "significantly under average"
I really haven't had negative sex experiences because I've kept my experiences far and few. It doesn't help that size queens are attracted to me for some bizarre reason. I'm pretty certain I can justify my phalloplastic pursuits, including the riskier methods.
lolololol
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 15, 2010 6:56:32 GMT -5
I know why you feel the way you feel about Uncle, especially since he hasn't been totally forthcoming. But there isn't any harm he can do here, since all he ever does is post one-liner responses lol
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 15, 2010 6:55:07 GMT -5
For girth that is *
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 15, 2010 6:54:49 GMT -5
5.25 I would say is slightly above average.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 14, 2010 17:36:48 GMT -5
I should note that until the doctor confirms it one way or the other, we aren't sure exactly what is going on, and since you mentioned your penis did look a little bit better than the other day with your Vladimir examination, hope still resides.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 14, 2010 17:33:48 GMT -5
Bonehead, if you need real-time company, I (and hopefully others here) don't mind logging into the chat function this forum has. No reason not to find something else to talk about since sleep may be difficult.
I know that sometimes these surgical ventures are too intimate to share with people in our lives. If your discussion on this matter happens to only be on the web, then let me know I'll be happy to setup real-time chat.
Let me know
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 14, 2010 17:30:14 GMT -5
Wow bonehead, I'm sorry to hear about these turn of events. The blood in the urine is alarming, and the condition of your skin deserves greater attention from the medical staff. I'm no doctor and there could be other explanations, but I'm not sure why the skin would revert to healing after this current fiasco.
Again, I'm no medical professional but from my experiences on these forums (in the past), you really need a sound medical decision in 24 hours (or less). I hope they can surgically improve the condition without removing the scaffolds but at this point its up in the air. The characteristics of your skin and the blood in the urine may imply some form of complication, be-it rejection or infection (or both). It also could be neither, and the scaffolding was placed poorly essentially damaging skin tissue. I'm no doctor so pardon my speculation. If you are on antibiotics, you may still overcome this, so be sure to rest and reinforce good health!
I am not trying to increase your anxiety, I'm going to try to help you keep a level head in the coming hours/days. It is imperative you explain to the nurse/doctor that this is not typical bruising or bleeding. In the meantime, relax and take comfort in knowing that the doctors working on you are experienced in this line of work. They will ultimately determine what is up, just take it easy in the meantime.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 14, 2010 15:43:54 GMT -5
I received an email back from Dr. Casavantes's office regarding PMMA, and I was told that the gains I was looking for may be too risky with that kind of PMMA volume. This might mean FFT's stock has gone even higher. Two syringes? Man you are going to have a thick one huh?
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 14, 2010 15:40:51 GMT -5
Viduka, thanks, the forum is indeed going on strong! I hope you join us more often for the discussion(s).
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 14, 2010 15:38:34 GMT -5
I received an email back from Dr. Casavantes's office regarding the extent the doctor would inject PMMA into the penis. When I asked about adding a significant amount of PMMA in one session, or even over the course of multiple sessions, their office replied by saying: There is potential to create deformities when adding this amount of product to this area. This should only be considered an enhancement.I find this to be truly remarkable. A doctor in Tijuana is actually expressing caution about how I go about this procedure?! In the same email they recommended no more than 2 sessions! I'm genuinely pleased and refreshed to see that there are some doctors out there who still behave like real doctors!I also remember reading Dr. Casavantes's blog where he warned against using PMMA for breast enhancement (when he could damn well profit off it) due to concerns that it would prevent a woman's ability to self-examine for breast cancer. I tell you what, I'm not endorsing the guy but he's got points with me. I feel like if you are looking for minor enhancements for girth and/or aesthetics to definitely consider. I, however, will most likely not go the PMMA route because of his warnings. Like IDM pointed out, large volumes may trigger an immune response especially in a dynamic "organ" like the penis. I am in need of significant gains so I may have to scratch this one off my list That's too bad, this doctor actually comes off as legit.
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 14, 2010 14:24:35 GMT -5
Flaccid is definitely a concern. For a guy like myself, who's erect girth rivals other guy's flaccid girths...you can only imagine what my OWN flaccid must look like. Take that a step further and give me some "shrinkage" or "turtling," and you get a penis that refuses to see the light of day. Makes locker rooms, pool/beaches, and other semi-genitalia exposing locations much more avoidable.
But I digress...
We do have some FFT options here in the states, Dr. Giunta for example. He's on the East Coast and offers reasonable rates. I understand he's also performing the Staged-FFT method, but I'm not familiar with his success rate(s). I should perhaps ask him by email or phone what he thinks about those type of gains (that I seek).
Frank, do you know how many CC's of FAT were injected into you each session?
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 14, 2010 14:09:48 GMT -5
Oh and Frank, just so you know - I modified your post and corrected the title: You originally wrote "FTT Progress" but I changed the FTT correctly to FFT. I don't normally police grammar and spelling, but some things I'll tweak
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Dec 14, 2010 14:04:46 GMT -5
Frank, I've been researching phalloplastic options for a few years now. This is primarily due to my not-so-average size. I'm in that gray area between "bigger-than-micro, but noticeably smaller-than-average" zone that I can't seem to find many others in. This is especially true for my girth. While my length might not be optimal, I'm convinced with rigorous stretching over time I can and will obtain enough to reach my 6" erect length goal.
As for girth however, I'm not sure manual PE exercise alone can satisfy the gains I seek. Honestly all options are open, which includes every single girth enhancing method. The only method I refuse to pursue is volumetric gain via silicone gel injections. Elist implant, PMMA, FFT, etc are all still being researched and are all possibilities.
FFT has in my mind been my primary "fall-back" method. In other words, if all other techniques prove too risky when I come to make my decision, FFT will by my automatic choice. This is because of the safe(r) nature of this method...using your own cells which eliminates rejection risks and keeps complications to a minimum.
My biggest issue with FFT was the concern for re-absorption as well as the aesthetics and "feel" of the final product. I understand that "Staged FFT" has made a leap in those areas, and this is exciting news. Testimonies from yourself and IDM also prove to be helpful in legitimizing FFT. I know you are not endorsing it, and still have some ways to go, but "on paper" this technique seems to be the only "provably effective" method out there.
And to be honest, most of the complaints about FFT were never penis-destroying or life-destroying dilemmas, but rather aesthetic complaints which I figured could be corrected over time with innovation and improvement on the doctor's end.
FFT is very much high on my list (maybe even #1). I wish wish wish the Elist implant possessed a much higher degree of success, but I know it doesn't. The only reason why I continue to contemplate the Elist implant is my need for significant girth gain. But I suppose with "high yield there is high risk," as they say. If FFT could afford me similar gains while retaining some reasonable level of realism, I may eventually commit to it. I'm also thinking about PMMA, which I like to think as the synthetic alternative to FFT but more permanent and also slightly less expensive.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But enough of my own introduction to you, lets get straight to my question(s).
I am seeking a 70% gain (in inches) in erect girth. That is my biggest dilemma... would such volumetric change in my penis distort it beyond realism and functionality? I'd imagine most guys who get girth enhancements see a 20-30% increase with the occasional 50%.
One does not have to be an expert in FFT to chime in on this question and dilemma. This question arises in virtually every method I seek out. The reason why I bring this question (that is very central to my research) to this thread is because FFT is my first choice.
Frank, I know you haven't measured a whole lot so you may not know what percentage increase your girth obtained, but if you were to eyeball it what would you suspect? Or better put - what percent of your penis do you think is fat and what percent is authentic phallus?
|
|