acu
New Member
Posts: 29
|
Post by acu on Nov 4, 2010 6:27:05 GMT -5
In my opinion, the best solution is to increase the size of the corpora cavernosa chambers, length and girth. This will be the only way to really give a natural looking and working organ. Now, I know a Dr. tried it but his subjetcs had major problems with infections. One patient went as far as shooting the Dr. but he sruvived, I believe. In this procedure, Runels is injecting your own blood/tissue. Do you remember what the other doctor was injecting? |
|
|
|
Post by hoddle10 on Nov 4, 2010 6:35:25 GMT -5
In my opinion, the best solution is to increase the size of the corpora cavernosa chambers, length and girth. This will be the only way to really give a natural looking and working organ. Now, I know a Dr. tried it but his subjetcs had major problems with infections. One patient went as far as shooting the Dr. but he sruvived, I believe. In this procedure, Runels is injecting your own blood/tissue. Do you remember what the other doctor was injecting? He wasn't injecting. He was doing something like a vein graft. It was nothing like this. Dr Runnels procedure seems to be along the lines of what other Dr's use hydrolic acid for head enarlgement. Only this stuff is made from your own blood and has growth factors. |
|
acu
New Member
Posts: 29
|
Post by acu on Nov 4, 2010 7:21:16 GMT -5
In this procedure, Runels is injecting your own blood/tissue. Do you remember what the other doctor was injecting? He wasn't injecting. He was doing something like a vein graft. It was nothing like this. Dr Runnels procedure seems to be along the lines of what other Dr's use hydrolic acid for head enarlgement. Only this stuff is made from your own blood and has growth factors. OK - well that's totally different then. We can't really draw any conclusions from that. Also, I sent Dr. Runels an email with 6 questions (actually 2 emails: one sent yesterday with 4 questions, and one sent today with 2 additional questions). So far I haven't received a reply. I will post his answers as soon as I get a response. acu |
|
acu
New Member
Posts: 29
|
Post by acu on Nov 4, 2010 8:02:24 GMT -5
There was a guy on the MNS board that had a medical background (I think he was studying to be a doctor) who I believe went by the handle: "informeddecisionmaker." Anyone know if he ever joined this board? I would be interested to get his opinion on this procedure.
Dr. Runels is located in Alabama and I happen to live in the Southeastern U.S., so this would be an easy trip for me. I just looked it up on MapQuest and it's an 8 hour drive, so I would probably fly. If I can be reasonably assured of the safety of the procedure, I may be able to have it done as soon as early January. I definitely would want to do more research, see some pictures, and possibly talk to some of his existing patients.
acu
|
|
|
|
Post by hoddle10 on Nov 4, 2010 8:34:15 GMT -5
There was a guy on the MNS board that had a medical background (I think he was studying to be a doctor) who I believe went by the handle: "informeddecisionmaker." Anyone know if he ever joined this board? I would be interested to get his opinion on this procedure. Dr. Runels is located in Alabama and I happen to live in the Southeastern U.S., so this would be an easy trip for me. I just looked it up on MapQuest and it's an 8 hour drive, so I would probably fly. If I can be reasonably assured of the safety of the procedure, I may be able to have it done as soon as early January. I definitely would want to do more research, see some pictures, and possibly talk to some of his existing patients. acu The idea of an 8 hour drive being considered near by is crazy to a British person. You can drive the length of the UK in less time than that. We need to find more out about the product itself. It's called Selphyl and is used mainly as a facial filler. The trouble is that it isn't that popular amongst plasitc surgeons as it isn't cost effective. It does the same thing as other fillers, only it needs to be prepared which takes half an hour or so. Other fillers come ready to use, so there is much advantage for plastic surgeons in using Selphyl. |
|
|
|
Post by hoddle10 on Nov 4, 2010 8:38:33 GMT -5
Here is a link to a teleconference where he talks about it: attendthisevent.com/Modern/?eventid=14945268He says he's done it on himself. I actually can't believe this will work, but as i said before, i can handle getting no gains, I just need to be sure it's safe. From what I've read I think it should be safe, so often there are risks that aren't apparent when reading how these things work. |
|
acu
New Member
Posts: 29
|
Post by acu on Nov 4, 2010 10:30:38 GMT -5
There was a guy on the MNS board that had a medical background (I think he was studying to be a doctor) who I believe went by the handle: "informeddecisionmaker." Anyone know if he ever joined this board? I would be interested to get his opinion on this procedure. Dr. Runels is located in Alabama and I happen to live in the Southeastern U.S., so this would be an easy trip for me. I just looked it up on MapQuest and it's an 8 hour drive, so I would probably fly. If I can be reasonably assured of the safety of the procedure, I may be able to have it done as soon as early January. I definitely would want to do more research, see some pictures, and possibly talk to some of his existing patients. acu The idea of an 8 hour drive being considered near by is crazy to a British person. You can drive the length of the UK in less time than that. We need to find more out about the product itself. It's called Selphyl and is used mainly as a facial filler. The trouble is that it isn't that popular amongst plasitc surgeons as it isn't cost effective. It does the same thing as other fillers, only it needs to be prepared which takes half an hour or so. Other fillers come ready to use, so there is much advantage for plastic surgeons in using Selphyl. Hoddle: 8 hours is a little too far to drive - I would definitely fly. As far as the procedure, Runels mentions in the Q & A's that the procedure is similar to the one they do for erectile dysfunction. I did some quick research on the ED injection. The ED drug is injected directly into the corpus cavernosum. The induced erection is only temporary of course, so a person must re-inject themselves each time they want an erection. I would imagine a guy would probably inject himself maybe 100 times or so over a period of a year or two or three. This leads to a question: if injecting a drug directly into your corpus cavernosum 100 or more times doesn't cause any major side effects, why would injecting your own blood (only once) cause any? Maybe I'm over-simplifying things, but it just seems like common sense. I have a bad habit of justifying something when I want it badly enough. acu |
|
|
|
Post by hoddle10 on Nov 4, 2010 10:55:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by hoddle10 on Nov 4, 2010 10:58:43 GMT -5
On there website, they say there are no side effects. www.selphyl.com/faqs"Since SELPHYL® uses your own blood and does not contain any animal or synthetic components, there is virtually no risk of an allergic reaction and there have been no reported allergic reactions to date. Consequently, skin allergy testing is unnecessary prior to treatment. However, if you have a history of allergies please inform your physician. There have been no known serious side effects reported in actual usage. However, you may experience some common reactions, such as mild irritation, edema, bruising, swelling, itching, discoloration or tenderness at the injection site. These temporary conditions typically resolve themselves within one to two days." |
|
acu
New Member
Posts: 29
|
Post by acu on Nov 4, 2010 12:35:38 GMT -5
On there website, they say there are no side effects. www.selphyl.com/faqs"Since SELPHYL® uses your own blood and does not contain any animal or synthetic components, there is virtually no risk of an allergic reaction and there have been no reported allergic reactions to date. Consequently, skin allergy testing is unnecessary prior to treatment. However, if you have a history of allergies please inform your physician. There have been no known serious side effects reported in actual usage. However, you may experience some common reactions, such as mild irritation, edema, bruising, swelling, itching, discoloration or tenderness at the injection site. These temporary conditions typically resolve themselves within one to two days." That was an interesting read. It seems side effect free, but of course it's only being injected directly under the skin for the facial rejuvenation procedures. What happens when it's injected into the corpus cavernosum? That's the real question. However, as I mentioned in my previous post, ED drugs are injected 100's of times directly into the CC without any major side effects. Not sure why this would be any different. Runnels mentions possible gains of 1 inch in both length and girth (gains of 10-20 %) and that most of the gains happen after about 3 weeks. Is that crazy or what? If this is in fact true, this would no doubt be the 'holy grail" of penis enlargement. If I can satisfy myself with the safety concerns, then I believe I will give it a shot sometime in early January. acu |
|
|
|
Post by hoddle10 on Nov 4, 2010 12:40:35 GMT -5
On there website, they say there are no side effects. www.selphyl.com/faqs"Since SELPHYL® uses your own blood and does not contain any animal or synthetic components, there is virtually no risk of an allergic reaction and there have been no reported allergic reactions to date. Consequently, skin allergy testing is unnecessary prior to treatment. However, if you have a history of allergies please inform your physician. There have been no known serious side effects reported in actual usage. However, you may experience some common reactions, such as mild irritation, edema, bruising, swelling, itching, discoloration or tenderness at the injection site. These temporary conditions typically resolve themselves within one to two days." That was an interesting read. It seems side effect free, but of course it's only being injected directly under the skin for the facial rejuvenation procedures. What happens when it's injected into the corpus cavernosum? That's the real question. However, as I mentioned in my previous post, ED drugs are injected 100's of times directly into the CC without any major side effects. Not sure why this would be any different. Runnels mentions possible gains of 1 inch in both length and girth (gains of 10-20 %) and that most of the gains happen after about 3 weeks. Is that crazy or what? If this is in fact true, this would no doubt be the 'holy grail" of penis enlargement. If I can satisfy myself with the safety concerns, then I believe I will give it a shot sometime in early January. acu I find the gains he mentions very difficult to believe. But if I'm satisfied it's safe, I'd give it a go. |
|
|
|
Post by wizard on Nov 4, 2010 15:38:33 GMT -5
Now guys remember the question to ask the Dr - has he done it to himself as he said originally he considered injecting his own dick with Restalyne. If not why not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Nov 4, 2010 15:41:28 GMT -5
Hello I finally got back some answers from the doctor. I'm actually in a hurry so I have no idea why I'm even posting this but I'll return to elaborate even more.
1 - He has injected his current method into his penis with positive results.
2 - There is some evidence it may also improve erection quality.
3 - The sample size is less than 100, and because of it he has no way of saying whether its permanent and how many top-offs one would need to achieve a certain size.
I will be back on later tonight, but I felt I had to share what I found out anyways, see ya later guys!
|
|
|
|
Post by sheldon on Nov 4, 2010 20:37:00 GMT -5
Skeptical One: Glad he was able to give you some feedback. I wrote to him and didn't get any response yet, but will keep everyone posted.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheldon on Nov 4, 2010 22:29:11 GMT -5
That was an interesting read. It seems side effect free, but of course it's only being injected directly under the skin for the facial rejuvenation procedures. What happens when it's injected into the corpus cavernosum? That's the real question. However, as I mentioned in my previous post, ED drugs are injected 100's of times directly into the CC without any major side effects. Not sure why this would be any different. Runnels mentions possible gains of 1 inch in both length and girth (gains of 10-20 %) and that most of the gains happen after about 3 weeks. Is that crazy or what? If this is in fact true, this would no doubt be the 'holy grail" of penis enlargement. If I can satisfy myself with the safety concerns, then I believe I will give it a shot sometime in early January. acu I find the gains he mentions very difficult to believe. But if I'm satisfied it's safe, I'd give it a go. acu: I applaud you for efforts to go and try this, but before you do, please get as much information as possible and see as many before and after pictures as well. It is one thing to lose $1900 and quite another thing to lose $1900 along with possible undesirable side effects. Hopefully this doctor will allow the posting of before and after pictures and perhaps some of his patients will join this forum to discuss this treatment option with members here. |
|
?