|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 6, 2011 4:45:34 GMT -5
Hi Guys, This thread is intended to concentrate our brainstorming on what shapes we can attain thanks to the flexibility of multiple sessions of PMMA as well as the availability of customized injections of varying degrees of collagen building concentrations of the solution (the percentage used in each spot). I have noted that Dr C is currently improving his results by better adapting the concentrations to stimulate more or less as required the thickening of the shaft in various parts. The first issue encountered was the ring, and the upper skin below the gland where he now uses quite weak concentrations to allow for a more gradual tapered appearance so that one's gland doesn't look like what one member here called "a small hat on a fat man". Also, it is noted by many here and elsewhere alike that women do happen to enjoy girth, extra length beyond 6 inches entering into what can become problem territory for full penetration when women have their cervix located not that far up in the womb. I only knew one women who was hurt badly by my relatively modest 5.5" length, which means that more would be subjected to painful experience with lengths beyond 6" and more. It is as if for their vanity they would smash our nuts while having sex. Sure they'd feel empowered just like a big guy ramming at a cervix, but we sure wouldn't be too happy. This is why even if I could lengthen beyond the target 6 inches I wouldn't want to stretch it beyond 6.5" as I don't want to have to sacrifice that quite insane pelvic pounding when you grip in close. Also I find that even if ultra wide is fine it would be best kept for the very base so that if possibly I might want to get a discrete one inch tall hump of padding added to the base of the stem so that once all is well and engaged the final thumping has an extra edge. It's a shame that a well intended foxy babe couldn't help us out by test driving different shapes and sizes, noting that it is only her own proportion's perspective. So here's a rough sketch of what I'd want to achieve, and of course I accept your applause for my fabulous mastery of high tech drawing tools and embedding of high resolution images LOL.
BEFORE
/:\ l l l l l l l l
AFTER
/:\ i . i l . l l . l /. . .\
I'd vote for a 6+ inch length with a 6" girth tapered down to 5.5" below the gland and increased at the base to maybe a much as 7" near the root - do you think that the widening of the base would make her dilate so much that the rest of the staff would feel thin? Maybe half an inch increase there would be enough, especially as who knows if it wouldn't look weird and unnatural? I had also wondered at one time, all aesthetic considerations aside, if a Coke Bottle shape wouldn't be appreciated. Maybe there's something to be said for having a very funny looking sex toy that is so addictive they'll walk miles for a moment with it (oops, I meant with YOU). HC
|
|
|
Post by justabitmore on Jun 6, 2011 10:51:14 GMT -5
;D ;D ;D
Made me think of the space shuttle lol
|
|
|
Post by mustang2020 on Jun 6, 2011 11:27:20 GMT -5
I think the high quality "after shape" drawing you prescribe is something I would prefer. My implant has a nice cone shaped to it and it measured 7" at the base, 6.5 mid shaft and about 5.5 at the glans. For me, this worked out great with the small ladies I tend to pick. The other ladies who where a bit older or had had children had no problem with the 7" girth. Now If I can improve on the glans just a bit, I will be a happy guy....I hope Dr. C can come up with a solution for the glans with pmma, I think it can be done!
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 6, 2011 13:17:54 GMT -5
;D ;D ;D Made me think of the space shuttle lol Hi Justabitmore, Actually it really does look like the shuttle, never imagined that! I'm wondering if this wouldn't look a little more realistic than a fully tapered one such as I've seen in some pictures. Then there's the comparison of what would work better, I figured that women once they "clamp down" on you get their lining locked up against it if it is large enough for them to do that. With a gradual cone entry would feel great to them but exit would sort of disappear from sensation I would imagine, unless they contract each time you move away? Go figure, here I go imagining what it would be like having a vagina, as if having a penis which doesn't suit me/her isn't bad enough. Thus far nobody has jumped at the suggestion of going for a coke bottle, let's remember that even if not too gorgeous it wouldn't look as bad as the beer can effect. It seems that for sensation purposes the next important breakthrough probably of higher significance than length extension, would be larger gland size. I think that a gland that is close to the size of an enlarged girth shaft would possibly bring some extra sensation inside, as well as when skirting with the ingress points? HC
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Jun 6, 2011 14:59:55 GMT -5
Maybe we should look at sex toys for answers...many are shaped to maximize pleasure or target certain sensations, just an idea..
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 6, 2011 15:03:34 GMT -5
Hi SO, The problem with anything of a commercial nature is that we cannot know for sure if they didn't shape them for marketing appeal to trigger an inconsequential $50 purchase - not something to permanently model your member after... It sure would be useful if we could locate a ladies only discussion board where they evaluate sex toys on a sensual shape basis. But that's probably not going to happen. HC
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 6, 2011 15:05:47 GMT -5
I think the high quality "after shape" drawing you prescribe is something I would prefer. My implant has a nice cone shaped to it and it measured 7" at the base, 6.5 mid shaft and about 5.5 at the glans. For me, this worked out great with the small ladies I tend to pick. The other ladies who where a bit older or had had children had no problem with the 7" girth. Now If I can improve on the glans just a bit, I will be a happy guy....I hope Dr. C can come up with a solution for the glans with pmma, I think it can be done! Hi Mustang2020, Are you planning on keeping the implant or switching to / adding PMMA? Also, is your shape totally gradual or is it in steps like the drawing I did with different slopes at the base and at the gland? TIA HC
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Jun 6, 2011 15:06:12 GMT -5
You never know, if this forum is here, I wouldn't put it past the ladies to have their own sex-related forum (although the sex toy forum would probably be a sub forum and not the greater theme of the message board). I've actually tried looking for it in the past and came across some interesting forums but nothing specifying sex toys...
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 6, 2011 15:08:46 GMT -5
SO,
It looks like we're going to have to put one of our more liberated lady friends to work at the girlie message boards checking with the other babes where the places are that these things are discussed. Word of mouth will probably get her further than any of our Google searches.
HC
|
|
|
Post by mustang2020 on Jun 6, 2011 15:58:11 GMT -5
I think the high quality "after shape" drawing you prescribe is something I would prefer. My implant has a nice cone shaped to it and it measured 7" at the base, 6.5 mid shaft and about 5.5 at the glans. For me, this worked out great with the small ladies I tend to pick. The other ladies who where a bit older or had had children had no problem with the 7" girth. Now If I can improve on the glans just a bit, I will be a happy guy....I hope Dr. C can come up with a solution for the glans with pmma, I think it can be done! Hi Mustang2020, Are you planning on keeping the implant or switching to / adding PMMA? Also, is your shape totally gradual or is it in steps like the drawing I did with different slopes at the base and at the gland? TIA HC I am very interested in the PMMA and Also in Dr. Runel's procedure! I spoke with him today and I guess he is still active in his method. The Elist implant is a gradual slight cone shaped. If you are 5-6 inches in erect length it gives a nice cone shape. Anything above that length and it is an excellent smooth very gradual cone shape. It is also very stiff in the erect state and it has been my experience that it helps getting women to orgasm fairly easily. Just remember, the implant has its few advantages and it has many disadvantages.
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 7, 2011 1:55:50 GMT -5
mustang2020Dr Runel is the one pioneering a special lengthening procedure using some sort of scaffolding, or am I confused? I really wish I could do something about the length on short notice, no pun intended. The reason being I want it to look as natural as possible erect. Yet if I want to reach for those highly desirable ecstatic girth inches one must get further yet from an authentic penile shape. It isn't so much for my ego or visual pleasure, but to maintain intact the effect of being "the man" in a woman's eye. Because, although I might be wrong in this assumption, that the impression of natural endowment makes them find you gifted as if loved by the gods, whereas what we're doing might be construed by penis venerating vestals as cheating with a cheap trick? Maybe it is because in Europe, cosmetic surgery has been slower to gain ground and extend further into people's daily lives. Here they seldom ever mention it to anyone but their closest friends, and I'm not just talking about intimate surgery but even things such as minor nips and tucks. Furthermore it is generally considered in many circles here to be an act of futile vanity as well as having mixed up values, being superficial and fatuous. There is little understanding or tolerance of the importance of aesthetics on identity and self-esteem, as that would be viewed as a sign of weakness. And the last thing one wants is for one's new powerful penis to become a symbol of weakness... HC
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Jun 7, 2011 2:22:02 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by mustang2020 on Jun 7, 2011 2:53:19 GMT -5
HC, it is my opinion I do PE for my own satisfaction and for my own self esteem, but it so happens the ladies enjoy it too.
There is a double standard every where in the world. They look down on people, especially men, who go for cosmetic surgery yet in every movie, ad, TV series they have beautiful men and women playing the parts!!
They tell our daughters not to worry about their looks and their weight, yet all the models in all the women rags have a 100 lbs beauties with long legs and flat stomaches!!!....There is a lot of Bullshit, denial, and double standards when it comes to these social matters.
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 7, 2011 22:49:10 GMT -5
@so I visited that thread and it seems that there was a consensus that he was too wacky or unusual to instill confidence in a volunteer to try out that procedure. It does have an appeal since it is similar in theory to the DHT cream I'm trying before PMMA. Do you think it would be useful after PMMA? I guess you'd have to schedule a touch up session with Dr C if it did work and shift things around... I'm especially interested in whether Dr Runel's procedure can enhance the gland. mustang2020There is a growing stigma about cosmetic surgery maybe due to a reaction against those very artificial standards which are thrust upon us by the media? It has gotten to the point that people now seek out the "natural look" in surgery such as rhinoplasty because it has become a source of ridicule when others say: "oh, look, they got one of those (insert expletive) nose jobs". I sort of want to avoid a similar stigma in the bedroom, or remarks such as "why on earth did you ever do such a thing to yourself?" HC
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Jun 8, 2011 0:30:35 GMT -5
The reason I'm willing to forgo minor aesthetics if it means reaching my girth goals is because penises themselves vary in themselves. In other words, unless the woman has seen tons of penises and is aware that such enhancement can be taken place, I doubt she'll ever know. That's my guess.
|
|