|
|
Post by idm on Jun 25, 2011 14:55:37 GMT -5
This is why its is so important that doctors look at each patient as individual and consider very carefully the detail of the individuals anatomy. Observation of detail makes, in my opinion all the difference in the world. We are not all created equal, in fact even those of us that may have similar characteristics, upon closer examination are quite different! Don't mean to digress (will respond to the bone press remark), but its so important for us, and more so for the doctors to appreciate subtle differences in anatomy particularly when performing aesthetic procedures! An aesthetic technique that is performed in a "cookie cutter method" is not good-not to imply this is the case w/Casavantes but I'm unfortunately it IS the case w/some other plastic surgereons performing certain procedures. Classic example:Breast augmentation-If you look at some doctors sites, every photographic image looks the same. Seemingly no regard for the patients individual (that word again), characteristics. As for the fanning out of pmma I refer to, to be clear, I'm not suggesting an overfill in the supra pubic area. YES, doing that could result in an appearance of a supra pubic fat pad. Fair to say that's not desirable. The thought of that is alarming to some of us, who have gone to great lengths to reduce or eliminate volume in this area! In certain cases, ie:men w/short flaccid length, very well planned/placed pmma, that is to say in the right amount and specific area, could create an appearance (coupled w/grooming), an appearance of a longer flaccid length. As a "grower" this is something I wish to discuss in my next and final round w/Casavantes. But to reiterate, I believe a fanning out or blending TO SOME DEGREE, perhaps w/a lesser concentration of pmma may prove very beneficial in terms of delivering a natural and more seemless contour. IDM idmThat's a very interesting remark, especially as I'm a grower soon to undergo a first PMMA treatment. However I wonder if possibly this base injection you recommend won't act like a fat layer, potentially reducing our non bone pressed erect length? Personally I'd rather have direct pubic bone contact during the more intense moments of intercourse. Wouldn't your recommendation reduce that contact? HC |
|
|
|
Post by idm on Jun 25, 2011 15:20:54 GMT -5
Haha! No, I wouldn't say it is "untrue". I am "retiring" BUT once in a while even a retired ball player might come out to throw the first pitch of a game! I'll continue to check pms if I can support someone but only post if I feel doing so is important. Best Always! IDM idmA recent copy of an email correspondence between you and another member suggested that you were "retired" from forum activity, but this seems to be untrue (at least I hope) lol. The new PhalloBoards is coming up soon and we'd hope to have you there, even if it means once every few months, to get a perspective much desired by the community. Whatever the case, good luck with your progress on the PMMA.  |
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 25, 2011 17:36:52 GMT -5
I think I agree with Uptown, I would prefer a penis which was wider in the middle. I think it would give greater stimulation to the woman. Imagine a penis the exact same girth from top to bottom that was completely smooth without the slightest ridge or lump. Once you have inserted it she wouldn't be able to feel you thrusting in and out. Whereas greater width mid shaft would have the effect of continually spreading the vaginal walls. Just a theory, what does everyone think of that ? Hi Mikehok, You hit the head on the nail, this is exactly what I was asking when I spoke of the "Coke Bottle Shape" in the perfect shape thread. It does make sense because both during ingress and egress she'll feel the vaginal wall spreading, maybe we ought to ask women who have played around with coke bottles or similarly shaped toys? It is important we figure this out before all getting permanent PMMA cone shaped dicks and finding out we'd have done better to get a thinner lower shaft... HC |
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 25, 2011 17:42:31 GMT -5
In certain cases, ie:men w/short flaccid length, very well planned/placed pmma, that is to say in the right amount and specific area, could create an appearance (coupled w/grooming), an appearance of a longer flaccid length. As a "grower" this is something I wish to discuss in my next and final round w/Casavantes. But to reiterate, I believe a fanning out or blending TO SOME DEGREE, perhaps w/a lesser concentration of pmma may prove very beneficial in terms of delivering a natural and more seemless contour. Your ideas for custom targeted PMMA in spots chosen for their incidence on flaccid length is interesting and merits further study by all in this forum along with Dr C. Also is it PMMA in lower concentrations you recommend for touch up, or were you thinking that it is better to start with smaller concentrations? HC |
|
|
|
Post by allgood on Jun 26, 2011 14:55:30 GMT -5
EP, very good to hear. When you said you had base work done, was it because of the situation I described (when erect, the PMMA looked like it stopped at the scrotum and didn't continue to the groin)? If so was that situation rectified? I experienced such on right-hand side. Do you remember the pics I posted? If not, you will see them at the new site. You are almost +30 since procedure. What is your status? How is your form? Hi EP, Thanks for your interest in my progress. Headed back for my second visit on Friday - six weeks on the nose. The base issue is definitely something I plan to have addressed, but you were right that it doesn't look as much like a prosthetic thing in the erect state anymore because the flaring has subsided. Form is good but main goal is to have the ring issue cleared up in a way that it tapers to my relatively small glans |
|
|
|
Post by mikehok on Jun 27, 2011 1:58:36 GMT -5
Hunchunk I think a cone shaped dick would still provide a similar effect but only once with every ingress/egress instead of twice if you had the middle bulge with a narrower base. I noticed some vibrators are even designed in that shape. www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=16767 |
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 27, 2011 9:23:15 GMT -5
mikehokWell said that is the Coke Bottle shape. However this shape might be more discrete and even almost natural looking, Dr C could possibly alternate concentrations in regular successive rings along the shaft - possibly a nice "finishing touch" for a 2rd PMMA session? www.lovehoney.co.uk/product.cfm?p=16603Here is a quote of one of this products reviewers: "The gentle ridges of the vibe feel very nice and caress my G-spot, bringing my to orgasm much quicker, the vibrations are AMAZING against my clit. I love teasing myself to orgasm with it."HC
|
|
|
|
Post by mikehok on Jun 27, 2011 13:22:33 GMT -5
Ok who is gonna be the first to ask Dr C for a cock like that !
|
|
|
|
Post by hunkchunk on Jun 27, 2011 13:40:18 GMT -5
I'll toy with the idea of getting me a toy... but not until the 3rd session LOL
HC
|
|
?