|
|
Post by newguy on Apr 24, 2011 14:05:04 GMT -5
ok ive been reading all about this i was thinking of going w/ doctor elist untill i really read into this, since length isnt much a concern for me, my question is, if this is injected does it cover up your vains, i have a vainy penis and believe it gives it a great look but am concerned pmma may cover my vains and look unnatural?
|
|
|
|
Post by smartman on Apr 24, 2011 14:22:42 GMT -5
newguy,
You will have plenty of new veins over the pmma and the new collagen.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheldon on Apr 24, 2011 14:36:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Skeptical One on Apr 24, 2011 15:01:20 GMT -5
sheldonPulmonary Embolism is a risk if ANY artificial filler gets injected to a blood vessel. This is entirely dependent on the skill of the doctor performing the injection(s), and if done correctly this risk is non-existent. As its relation to "Concerns & Articles" with PMMA, I'd say what stands out most by this (Argentinian Model) article is that the risk of human error is present in virtually all procedures minor or major carried out in this world. That's why the proficiency of the doctor performing it is of extreme importance. As the article states: "...The surgeon likely used large needles to inject the PMMA deep into the buttocks (creates a nicer contour than superficial injections) and inadvertantly injected into a major vein. The PMMA then likely travelled back to her lungs, clogged the major vessel, and she could no longer get enough oxygen into her body, killing her. This could have been prevented by using a blunt cannula, like the one I use when grafting fat into the buttocks. The cannula is so flat and blunt that it’s nearly impossible to inject into a blood vessel."
|
|
|
|
Post by ripple on Apr 24, 2011 15:08:09 GMT -5
Also, re: Pete Burns--I believe the substance referenced--polyacrylamide--isn't the same as pmma.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheldon on Apr 24, 2011 17:39:27 GMT -5
Also, re: Pete Burns--I believe the substance referenced--polyacrylamide--isn't the same as pmma. sorry about the confusion of the two substances. @ SO: Good advice and commentary. |
|
|
|
Post by gamecock on May 2, 2011 23:29:37 GMT -5
My biggest concern is migration, especially during the first 24 to 48 hours. How does Dr. C keep a liquid filler that doesn't completely set for 2 days from leaking/migrating into the scrotum? Let's say that someone (me) has a major "turkey neck" that goes up the shaft 2 or 3 inches when erect, how could he possibly keep the filler in place around the shaft towards the base. In my mind, i don't see anything holding it in place once the regular tight shaft skin is replaced by loose hanging skin leading into the scrotum. Maybe this is because I don't understand where/how the PMMA attaches.
|
|
?