"The Base" Jun 25, 2011 14:55:37 GMT -5
Post by idm on Jun 25, 2011 14:55:37 GMT -5
This is why its is so important that doctors look at each patient as individual and consider very carefully the detail of the individuals anatomy.
Observation of detail makes, in my opinion all the difference in the world. We are not all created equal, in fact even those of us that may have similar characteristics, upon closer examination are quite different! Don't mean to digress (will respond to the bone press remark), but its so important for us, and more so for the doctors to appreciate subtle differences in anatomy particularly when performing aesthetic procedures!
An aesthetic technique that is performed in a "cookie cutter method" is not good-not to imply this is the case w/Casavantes but I'm unfortunately it IS the case w/some other plastic surgereons performing certain procedures. Classic example:Breast augmentation-If you look at some doctors sites, every photographic image looks the same. Seemingly no regard for the patients individual (that word again), characteristics.
As for the fanning out of pmma I refer to, to be clear, I'm not suggesting an overfill in the supra pubic area. YES, doing that could result in an appearance of a supra pubic fat pad. Fair to say that's not desirable. The thought of that is alarming to some of us, who have gone to great lengths to reduce or eliminate volume in this area!
In certain cases, ie:men w/short flaccid length, very well planned/placed pmma, that is to say in the right amount and specific area, could create an appearance (coupled w/grooming), an appearance of a longer flaccid length. As a "grower" this is something I wish to discuss in my next and final round w/Casavantes.
But to reiterate, I believe a fanning out or blending TO SOME DEGREE, perhaps w/a lesser concentration of pmma may prove very beneficial in terms of delivering a natural and more seemless contour.
That's a very interesting remark, especially as I'm a grower soon to undergo a first PMMA treatment. However I wonder if possibly this base injection you recommend won't act like a fat layer, potentially reducing our non bone pressed erect length? Personally I'd rather have direct pubic bone contact during the more intense moments of intercourse. Wouldn't your recommendation reduce that contact?